The aerospace community was once again captivated on the 6th March 2025, as SpaceX launched its latest iteration of the Starship vehicle. However, excitement quickly turned to concern as the massive spacecraft experienced an in-flight explosion, resulting in debris raining down over the Caribbean. This failure marks another dramatic event in the iterative development of Starship, a program that has seen multiple test flights, some of which have ended in catastrophic failures.

From an aerospace reliability engineering perspective, lets explore what the SpaceX engineering teams are likely doing in the aftermath of this latest SpaceX Starship explosion to determine the root cause of the failure. Analyzing and learning from such incidents is critical in the world of spacecraft reliability, and understanding these processes helps us appreciate the complexity of launching and operating reusable space vehicles.

Understanding the Importance of Failure in SpaceX’s Engineering Approach

SpaceX embraces rapid iteration and deployment based testing approach, which is quite different from traditional aerospace programs which favor system integration level testing and analysis over iterative real world trials.. The approach allows SpaceX to learn quickly from failures, improving subsequent Starship iterations in an agile manner taking lessons learned from the tech industry development practices. While some see these explosions as setbacks, they are, in fact, valuable data points that enable engineers to enhance the vehicle’s reliability for future missions.

With that in mind, let’s break down what likely happens in the hours, days, and weeks following a SpaceX Starship launch failure from a reliability engineering perspective.

Immediate Post-Explosion Response: Data Collection and Initial Assessments

  1. Telemetry and Sensor Data Review

SpaceX engineers will immediately turn to telemetry data recorded during the flight. This data includes:

  • Structural integrity sensors that monitor stress and loads on the vehicle
  • Engine performance metrics (chamber pressure, temperature, thrust levels, and propellant mixture ratios)
  • Flight trajectory data from onboard guidance systems
  • Thermal readings to detect overheating or abnormal thermal conditions
  • Pressure sensors monitoring the fuel and oxidizer tanks
  • Video feeds from onboard and external cameras

This high-fidelity data provides a second-by-second record of what happened leading up to the explosion. Engineers will attempt to pinpoint the exact moment the anomaly occurred and work backward to identify possible causes.

  1. Debris Analysis and Recovery

If debris has fallen in a recoverable area, SpaceX will deploy teams to collect wreckage. Analyzing the structural condition of the recovered components can provide clues about the failure sequence.

For example, if engineers find melted engine components, it could indicate an overheating issue or burn propagation. If they find that the stainless-steel skin has fractured in a particular manner, it might suggest an overpressure event or structural fatigue. Finite element analysis can add validity to these kinds of findings. 

Root Cause Investigation: The Engineering Deep Dive

Once the initial data is gathered, SpaceX will initiate a structured root cause analysis (RCA) process. Several reliability engineering methodologies are typically used in spacecraft reliability investigations:

  1. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

FTA is a top-down, deductive approach that engineers use to systematically identify potential causes of failure. In this case, the top-level failure event is the explosion, and engineers would branch down into possible contributing factors such as:

  • Structural failure
  • Engine anomaly
  • Propellant system failure
  • Electrical system failures
  • Guidance and control issues

Each possible failure mode is broken down further to find weak points in the design or operational parameters.

  1. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

FMEA is a bottom-up analysis method used to evaluate all potential failure modes of a system and their effects. SpaceX likely has completed the FMEA on all of the Starship systems, and will use that information to determine the root cause failure mode. Engineers will likely review Starship’s key subsystems, including:

  • Raptor engine reliability: Were there any pre-launch indicators of an issue with the methane-fueled Raptor engines?
  • Tank pressurization system: Did the Super Heavy booster or Starship itself experience a rapid over pressurization event?
  • Heat shielding and thermal expansion: Could heating from reentry or engine plume interaction have caused a catastrophic structural failure?
  • Software and avionics: Were there anomalies in the flight control software that led to an incorrect maneuver or sequence?

Each failure mode is assigned a probability and severity score to prioritize areas for further investigation.

  1. Computational Simulations and Digital Twin Analysis

Reportedly SpaceX heavily utilizes digital twin technology, where a virtual system model of Starship can be used to simulate different flight conditions and failure modalities. Engineers will likely run post-failure simulations based on the real telemetry data to replicate the exact conditions leading up to the explosion. These simulations help validate potential failure hypotheses and rule out unlikely scenarios.

  1. Material and Component Testing

If physical debris is recovered, SpaceX will conduct detailed material analysis, including:

  • Metallurgical inspections for fatigue fractures, corrosion, or defects in the stainless-steel structure
  • Engine forensic analysis to detect signs of combustion instability, overheating, or improper fuel mixtures
  • Seal and valve integrity checks in the fuel system to identify leaks or ruptures

Implementing Corrective Actions for Future Flights

Once the root cause is determined, SpaceX will focus on corrective actions to ensure the issue is resolved before the next test flight. Some common mitigation strategies include:

  • Redesigning faulty components: If an engine component was identified as a failure point, engineers may modify its geometry, materials, or cooling mechanisms.
  • Adjusting operational parameters: Flight software may be updated to alter throttle settings, burn times, or tank pressurization limits and updating flight operation envelope parameters
  • Enhanced pre-launch testing: SpaceX may introduce additional static fire tests or tank pressure cycles to verify reliability before another launch.
  • Upgraded structural reinforcements: If structural failure is identified as the root cause, thicker material layers, better welding techniques, or reinforced sections may be introduced in the next vehicle iteration.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Starship Reliability

Every SpaceX Starship launch failure provides valuable lessons that bring the company closer to making Starship a reliable, reusable spacecraft. While traditional aerospace programs often see failures as setbacks, SpaceX embraces them as stepping stones toward an operational system. This relentless iteration and learning-from-failure approach has been the hallmark of SpaceX’s success delivering highly reliable space systems with Falcon 9, Crew Dragon, and now it is being applied to Starship.

As SpaceX continues refining Starship’s design, expect to see significant advancements in spacecraft reliability. Whether it’s through improved materials, more robust software, or better sensor diagnostics, each launch gets them closer to achieving their ultimate goal: making human spaceflight to Mars a reality.

Conclusion

The SpaceX Starship explosion on 6th March 2025, is another chapter in the development of the world’s most ambitious spacecraft. While the public may see these failures as catastrophic, reliability engineers recognize them as necessary steps in the evolution of space technology.

By systematically analyzing flight data, recovering debris, conducting root cause investigations, and implementing design improvements, SpaceX is laying the foundation for the future of space exploration. As history has shown, the greatest aerospace achievements are built upon the lessons learned from failure. SpaceX’s commitment to rapid iteration ensures that Starship will continue to evolve and, eventually, succeed in revolutionizing human space travel.

About Aging Aircraft Solutions

We provide systems engineering, reliability engineering and data analysis to the aerospace and defense industry to help maintain, sustain and improve aerospace and aircraft systems. Please contact us if you would like a consultation on how we can augment your engineering and analysis team to rapidly improve and accelerate your programs and initiatives.